Updates
Bulletins, correspondence, and notes from the record.
Comment opens on Phase 1 station siting
Sixty days on the six Phase 1 station locations. Written comment or in person, whichever is easier.
From the archive: the 1927 survey
A document box, a surveyor nobody remembers, and the first time somebody proposed running a cable over this corridor.
The Beltline transit question, in dates
A plain chronology of what has been proposed, approved, funded, and built. Every item below is a matter of public record.
Correspondence received
A selection from the inbox: a man worried about his view, a school that wants a speaker, and one we cannot account for.
A reader asks about 27 May
A correspondent noticed a date in the 1931 sheet that also appears in our records requests. It is a coincidence.
On the numbering
Why the 1927 finding aid lists fourteen items when the box contains eleven.
On being asked to revise our costings twice
Both requests were reasonable. We have been going back through them anyway.
The item is no longer on the agenda
After seven months among the alternatives under review, the aerial alignment stopped appearing in the papers. We do not know why.
Memorandum 04 is posted
Revised alignment, two station locations moved, and one span lengthened over a parcel we could not trace.
Thank you, and a correction
Two thousand signatures, and a figure on this website that was wrong for four months.
A note on tower spacing
Why the towers sit where they do, and why there are fewer of them than people expect.
What we heard at the open houses
Four evenings, roughly two hundred people, and the three questions that came up at every one of them.
Coalition commissions a corridor feasibility study
An independent assessment of an aerial alignment along the Beltline, to be delivered in January.